Pedeapsa, care este cea maxima în Norvegia, va putea fi prelungita atât timp cât Breivik va fi considerat periculos.
Instanta, formata din cinci judecatori, l-a gasit în unanimitate pe Breivik /33 de ani/ responsabil de faptele sale, respingând astfel una dintre expertizele psihiatrice, care îl descria ca suferind de 'schizofrenie paranoida'. Inculpatul va putea depune cerere de eliberare conditionata doar dupa executarea a minumum 10 ani de detentie, iar la ora actuala avocatii lui Breivik dispun de 14 zile pentru a face apel împotriva verdictului. Dupa aceea decizia va intra efectiv în vigoare.
La intrarea în sala de tribunal amenajata special pentru acest proces, dupa ce i-au fost scoase catusele, extremistul - îmbracat cu un costum negru, camasa alba si cravata gri - a facut salutul sau de extrema dreapta, apoi a ascultat zâmbind verdictul. În perspectiva pronuntarii acestuia, bariere de securitate au fost amplasate în fata tribunalului din capitala norvegiana.
În interiorul salii, Breivik era separat de un geam protector de rude ale victimelor aflate la fata locului. De asemenea, camere de filmat controlate de la distanta filmau audierea, transmitând imagini catre alte tribunale din Norvegia unde alte rude puteau privi procesul în direct.
Mohamad Hadi Hamed, 21 de ani, una dintre victimele lui Breivik care a scapat cu viata, dar care acum se afla într-un scaun cu rotile, a povestit pentru instanta cum i-au fost amputate bratul stâng si piciorul stâng dupa ce a fost împuscat de inculpat.
La 22 iulie, Breivik a ucis 77 de persoane, opt într-un atentat cu bomba împotriva sediului guvernului din Oslo, apoi 69, majoritatea adolescenti, într-o tabara a tineretului laburist pe insula Utoeya, deghizat în politist. Cea mai tânara victima decedata a avut 14 ani. Aceste atacuri au socat pasnica Norvegie si au evidentiat lipsa de pregatire a politiei si a serviciilor sale de securitate în astfel de cazuri, noteaza AFP.
Prin verdictul tribunalului din Oslo, Breivik obtine satisfactie evitând internarea psihiatrica, de care se temea ca îi va discredita ideologia rasista si xenofoba. Aspectul cel mai controversat al procesului, care a durat între 16 aprilie si 22 iunie, a fost sanatatea mintala a inculpatului. O prima expertiza psihiatrica a concluzionat ca Breivik nu este responsabil din punct de vedere penal, iar o a doua l-a declarat sanatos. Breivik a recunoscut ca este autorul masacrului, dar a pledat nevinovat: el a explicat ca a comis acte 'atroce, dar necesare' pentru a proteja Norvegia de un multiculturalism pe care îl considera nociv.
Dupa încheierea procedurilor de astazi, Anders Behring Breivik se va întoarce la închisoarea Ila, la circa douazeci de kilometri de Oslo, pentru a-si continua 'detentia preventiva'. El este repartizat într-un grup de celule mici într-o zona pentru prizonieri considerati deosebit de periculosi. Extremistul, care se prezinta ca fiind un 'scriitor', afirma ca are mai multe carti în pregatire, printre care si o autobiografie. El are propria sa camera pentru exercitii fizice si o camera de studiu. Alti detinuti au întreaga închisoare la dispozitie, cu sali de sport si biblioteci si pot merge si la munca. Breivik nu beneficiaza de aceste privilegii.
Potrivit unui sondaj publicat vineri de tabloidul Verdens Gang, 72% dintre norvegieni apreciaza ca acuzatul este suficient de sanatos pentru a fi condamnat la închisoare.
Casi di pedofilia all'interno della Chiesa cattolica
Sacerdote, insegnate e anche pedofilo, secondo la magistratura. E’ stato condannato, in rito abbreviato, dal gup Claudio Mattioli, a 4 anni e due mesi, un sacerdote accusato di aver abusato di due ragazzini.
Il prete, A.D. [Don Antonio Calcedonio Di Maggio - n.d.R.TA], di 58 anni, di origine siciliana, officiava nella diocesi dedicata alla Madonna di Czestokova, alla Rustica, e insegnava religione alla scuola media di Roma «Salvo D'Acquisto». L’uomo, che per i fatti oggetto del procedimento era anche finito in manette, è da tempo agli arresti domiciliari in un convento di Benedettini Silvestrini a Bassano Romano. Il capo d’imputazione per A.D. è: atti sessuali con minori, aggravati dal fatto che le vittime erano a lui affidate «per ragioni di educazione e di vigilanza». Il giudice ha imposto anche una provvisionale di 15mila euro di rimborso alle vittime.
GIA' CONDANNATOPER LO STESSO REATO - In passato era già stato condannato dieci anni fa per una storia molto simile ma, scontata la pena, era tornato alla sua attività a scuola e all’oratorio. Arrestato nell’estate scorsa, il religioso, inizialmente, aveva negato tutto, ma in seguito aveva confessato, almeno in parte, cercando però di sminuire la gravità delle violenze. La prima denuncia a carico di A.D. venne presentata dai genitori di un dodicenne con gravi problemi psichici, un ragazzo "affetto da un disturbo del comportamento nell'ambito dell'organizzazione cognitiva borderline". Il giovane, che frequentava l'oratorio della Rustica, raccontò di essere stato palpeggiato e molestato dal sacerdote e, qualche giorno dopo, alcuni amichetti della stessa età gli raccontarono di aver subìto lo stesso tipo di violenze. In seguito si accertò un secondo caso, avvenuto, stavolta, durante un campo scuola nell'isola di Ventotene.
A.D. [ Don Antonio Calcedonio Di Maggio - n.d.R.TA ] aveva sorpreso un gruppo di ragazzi che scherzavano e si misuravano gli organi genitali. Il religioso avrebbe approfittato della circostanza per rivolgere pesanti avances a un altro adolescente, anche lui di 12 anni.
Il religioso ha confessato: quattro anni e due mesi di carcere grazie al rito abbreviato
La prima condanna risale a una decina di anni fa, la seconda è arrivata ieri mattina. E sempre per lo stesso reato: il sacerdote è accusato di aver compiuto atti sessuali con minori, con ragazzini che gli erano stati affidati da inconsapevoli e fiduciosi genitori. Ad Antonio Calcedonio Di Maggio, 58 anni, il gup Claudio Mattioli ha inflitto quattro anni e due mesi di carcere. Una pena ridotta di un terzo grazie allo sconto previsto dal rito abbreviato. Per il religioso, che prima di finire nei guai con la giustizia era sacerdote nella chiesa della Madonna di Czestochowa, a La Rustica, e insegnante di religione nella scuola media «Salvo D' Acquisto», il pm Nunzia D' Elia aveva chiesto sei mesi in più di reclusione. Ma il giudice ha deciso di concedergli le attenuanti generiche, considerando la lieve entità delle molestie e soprattutto il risarcimento dei danni già liquidato alle vittime, due ragazzini.
Di Maggio era finito dietro le sbarre a novembre dell' anno scorso e, dopo aver trascorso qualche giorno a Regina Coeli, aveva ottenuto gli arresti domiciliari nel convento dell' Ordine dei monaci benedettini silvestrini, a Bassano Romano. All' origine dell' ordinanza di custodia cautelare c' era stata la denuncia dei genitori (furibondi) di un dodicenne, che si era confidato e aveva raccontato di essere stato molestato dal sacerdote. Secondo l' accusa, nella primavera del 2006 il religioso aveva indotto il ragazzino, un suo allievo, a subire palpeggiamenti nell' oratorio della chiesa della Madonna di Czestochowa. Interrogato dopo l' arresto, Di Maggio aveva giurato che l' accusa era falsa, ma poi aveva corretto il tiro e aveva ammesso, almeno in parte, che l' abuso c' era stato. L' adolescente però non si è limitato a raccontare l' incubo in cui era precipitato: ha riferito al pubblico ministero di aver saputo che anche alcuni coetanei avevano subito le attenzioni del sacerdote. E indagando è emerso un secondo episodio, analogo al precedente: un altro dodicenne molestato durante un campo-scuola a Ventotene, l' estate scorsa. Anche questa accusa, in prima battuta, è stata respinta dal religioso. Che invece ieri in aula ha finito per confessare, ammettendo che anche nel campeggio sull' isola aveva abusato di un allievo.
Don Giorgio Mazzoccato condannato a 6 anni per abusi e violenze a 10 bambine e bambini quando era parroco ad Arpinova (Fg). Oggi lavora nella parrocchia di Castelluccio dei Sauri.
Si suicida don Giuseppe Rassello, condannato a 3 anni e 6 mesi, in appello ridotti a 2, per abusi sessuali su un 14enne del rione Sanità, a Napoli. I funerali sono celebrati dal cardinale Michele Giordano.
Don Marco Gamba, parroco a Chiusa San Michele (To) condannato a 4 anni per abusi nei confronti di due chierichetti e possesso di materiale pedo-pornografico.
Don Giuseppe Carpi condannato al pagamento di 30 milioni di lire per molestie ad una ragazza 14enne quando era parroco a Santa Margherita Ligure. Oggi è parroco di S. Maria di Nazareth a Sestri Levante (Ge).
Don Renato Mariani condannato a 4 anni per violenza sessuale a minori quando era parroco a San Giuliano Milanese. Oggi è parroco della Natività di San Giovanni Battista a Melegnano.
Don Bruno Tancredi, parroco di Monticelli (Te), condannato a 6 anni per violenze ai danni di due minori, uno dei quali disabile. Oggi lavora in diocesi, senza alcun incarico specifico.
Don Roberto Volaterra, parroco di Castagnole Piemonte (To), condannato a 1 anno e 8 mesi e pagamento di 45mila euro per violenza sessuale nei confronti di una bambina di 13 anni che frequentava l'oratorio. Oggi è collaboratore parrocchiale a S. Andrea a Savigliano (Cn).
Don Paolo Pellegrini, parroco di San Gioacchino a Colleferro (Roma), in passato già segnalato ai carabinieri per atti osceni, condannato a 6 anni e al pagamento di 60mila euro per violenza sessuale e istigazione all'uso di sostanze stupefacenti su un minorenne.
Don Roberto Mornati, prete di Gavirate (Va), condannato a 3 anni e 4 mesi e al pagamento di 280mila euro per abusi nei confronti di 12 minori. In passato aveva già subito un processo per molestie.
Patteggia 2 anni e 6 mesi don Felice Cini, condannato per aver molestato alcuni bambini della parrocchia di Arcille (Gr).
VIDEO RAI 2 - AnnoZero: Preti pedofili protetti dal Vaticano.
Patteggia 2 anni e 6 mesi don Bruno Puleo per abusi sessuali nei confronti di 7 ragazzi che frequentavano il seminario di Agrigento. A Marco Marchese, una delle vittime, il vescovo di Agrigento, da cui si era recato prima di rivolgersi alla Procura, chiede un risarcimento di 200mila euro per danni arrecati all'immagine della Chiesa agrigentina, salvo poi ritirare la richiesta [Puleo è stato denunciato dapprima al parroco don Giuseppe Veneziano (il vice-rettore), poi al preside del seminario don Gaetano Montana ed in seguito anche all'Arcivescovo metropolita di Agrigento S.E. Mons. Carmelo Ferraro, tutti citati poi nel processo come persone informate sui fatti - n.d.Red.TA].
Patteggia 3 anni per pedofilia padre Domenico Marcanti, animatore alla scuola media dell'Istituto Don Orione di Alessandria.
Don Giorgio Barbacini condannato a 3 anni e mezzo per abusi sessuali nei confronti di un minorenne extracomunitario che aveva in custodia presso la comunità "Migrantes" di Savona. Oggi lavora in un'altra diocesi.
Don Mauro Stefanoni, parroco di Laglio (Co), condannato a 8 anni e al pagamento di 150mila euro per abusi sessuali nei confronti di un minore disabile. Oggi lavora nella diocesi di Como, senza alcun incarico specifico.
Don Pierangelo Bertagna, parroco di Farneta (Ar), condannato a 8 anni per violenze sessuali a diversi minorenni. Viene sospeso dal vescovo di Arezzo e dimesso dallo stato clericale da papa Benedetto XVI. Č la prima volta che l'autorità ecclesiastica punisce un prete pedofilo.
Don Emilio Manzolini condannato a 4 anni per violenze sessuali a due bambine di 9 anni quando era parroco di Santa Rosa da Viterbo, a Roma. Oggi lavora nella comunità di Albavilla (Co) della congregazione del Sacro Cuore di Gesù.
Don Antonio Calcedonio Di Maggio condannato a 4 anni per molestie sessuali a due minorenni della parrocchia romana Madonna di Czestochowa e della scuola media "Salvo D'Acquisto", dove insegnava religione. Già in passato aveva avuto una condanna per reati simili. Oggi risulta essere ancora viceparroco nella stessa parrocchia.
Don Lelio Cantini, ex parroco della Regina della Pace a Firenze, viene dimesso dallo stato clericale da papa Benedetto XVI perchè ritenuto responsabile di abusi e violenze sessuali su decine di minori fra il 1973 e il 1987. Nel 2005, l'allora vescovo di Firenze, il cardinale Ennio Antonelli, a cui le vittime si erano rivolte, si era limitato a vietare a don Cantini di celebrare la messa in pubblico per 5 anni.
A spokesman for the Northeast Frontier Railway Nripen Bhattacharya said in Guwahati that three special trains had left for Bangalore yesterday taking back in a phased manner those who had fled from the capital of Karnataka fearing attacks on them sparked by rumours in the wake of violence in Assam The official, however, could not give the exact number of people returning to Bangalore.
Government officials said it would take two to three days before all of them returned to Bangalore and other cities like Pune and Chennai from where thousands of fear-stricken Northeasterners had fled. After four days of panic-driven exodus of Northeasterners, the situation eased today with police and railway officials saying it has stopped in Karnataka and reduced to a trickle in Tamil Nadu.
In contrast to the exodus of people from the northeast, it was a normal situation in Bangalore which was turned into a virtual fortress amid tight security. Upto 30,000 people had fled the country's IT capital since late last week which abated yesterday after the government went overdrive to instil confidence in the people from northeast. Over 18,000 police personnel, bolstered by Rapid Action Force (RAF) and Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), kept a hawk-like vigil in Bangalore with Ramzan also being celebrated.
"The situation is absolutely peaceful and normal ... People from the northeast are going about their chores without any disturbance and the exodus has completely stopped", additional commissioner of police (law and order) Suneel Kumar told PTI. Bangalore Police commissioner Jyothi Prakash Mirji said they have held several peace committee meetings with community leaders and police also intensified night patrolling. Railways, which ran additional trains to Guwahati after the sudden rush of fleeing northeasterners, did not operate any special services for the second consecutive day.
The Jesuit-led Vatican is the common denominator of power in Britain, Israel, and the United States. The Vatican is the head of New World Order monster and she has big plans for earthly Jerusalem. To understand how all of the intrigue has come to a head in our time, we must take a closer look at the historical record.
In order to understand that the Vatican has the upper hand on both Britain and America, we need to examine the American Revolution. The United States is Rome’s satellite and has been since the end of the Revolution. The historical record shows that the Jesuits fomented the American Revolution using Freemasonry as a cover. Prior to the American Revolution, 10 out of 13 colonies had put in place strict penal measures against Roman Catholicism and Catholics. Rome couldn’t stand for that so she brought about the Revolution to correct the situation. The Constitution opened the door in the United States for the flourishing of Roman Catholicism and other cults. All of this was part of the Jesuit-led continuing counter-reformation that began in the 1540’s. The U.S. Constitution with its ‘freedom of religion’ gave us a Jesuitical/Freemasonic/universalist government that put Rome in the driver’s seat of the New World Order. The New World Order was launched right here on American soil in 1776. Rome and Britain had been locked in a battle for world dominance and Rome was working desperately to get Britain back under her control since Britain broke off during the Reformation. The Spanish Armada was a failure, so Rome had to resort to covert means.
Catholic Monarch King James II during his reign in England put the forth the Jesuit constructed ‘Declaration of Indulgences’ (1687) in order to lift the restrictions against Catholicism in England. It was written to include tolerance for all religions, but was really a mask to give tolerance to Rome. In 1688, English Protestants refused the Declaration and deposed Catholic King James II from the throne.
“The Liberty James wanted them to proclaim was neither more nor less than indulgence to the Jesuits and the whole Church of Rome. Men knew the hand from which it came and saw the latent intention. Under the specious plea of toleration and liberty, the object of the Declaration was to advance Popery… and give license… to the Church of Rome, and all its schemes for reconquering England.” (John Charles, Ryle, Churchman, Feb. 1880)
Fast forward 100 years and the ‘Declaration of Indulgences’ was re-written as the ‘Declaration of Independence’ and solidified in the U.S. Constitution under the guise of ‘freedom of religion’. The American Revolution was not about tea or taxes. It was a religious war.
With the American Revolution, Rome killed two birds with one stone. (1) Rome separated the American Colonies from Britain and delivered the colonies and all their wealth into Rome’s hand. (2) As part of the continuing Jesuit-led counter-reformation, Rome created the Constitution with ‘freedom of religion’ built into it in order to allow Roman Catholicism to come in and swallow up biblical Christianity that had existed in the colonies.
Remember, Catholicism had been banned in 10 out of 13 colonies. The American Revolution and Constitution made legal (Catholicism) what had been made illegal (Catholicism) in England.
Tupper Saussy wrote in his book Rulers of Evil:
“Before the Constitution was ratified, American Catholics had few civil rights; after ratification, they had them all… the Constitution welcomed agents of Pontifex Maximus, the world’s chief enemy of Protestantism, into the ranks of government. Of the 2,500,000 enumerated inhabitants in 1787 America, the Roman Catholic population consisted of no more than 16,000 in Maryland, 7,000 in Pennsylvania, 1,500 in New York, and 200in Virginia. Once the Constitution was in place, a steady influx of European immigrants transformed Roman Catholicism from America’s smallest to largest religious denomination. By 1850, the higher powers at Rome could view the United States as a viable tributary, if not another papal state.”
The whole American Revolution was a Jesuit scam. Most people wanted to stay loyal to Britain. Freemasons inside the British Parliament pushed laws/taxes on the American colonists to get them angry and rouse them to rebellion. Freemasons on the ground in the colonies fanned the flames of revolution. Washington’s Masonic Lodge at Fredricksburg, Virginia was Catholic/Jacobite infested. Jacobite Hugh Mercer came over to America from Scotland after having fought for the Catholic Jacobite cause in the Army of Bonnie Prince Charlie. Hugh Mercer joined the Masonic Lodge in Fredricksburg, Virginia and eventually became its master. Jacobite Hugh Mercer was also a close friend and adviser to George Washington. The Fredricksburg Masonic Lodge had 8 members who were generals in the American Revolution (Washington, Mercer, George Weedon, William Woodford, Fielding Lewis, Thomas Posey, Gustavus Wallace, and the Marquis de Lafayette). The Fredricksburg Masonic Lodge got its charter from the Mother Kilwinning Lodge of Scotland in 1758.
Prior to the American Revolution, the Jesuits infiltrated Freemasonry in the mid-1700’s, which had evolved from the fugitive Templars during the 14th-16thCenturies. While hiding within the order of Freemasonry, the Jesuits were also operating on the ground out in the open. The British General Haldimand wrote to his superiors in the British Government that the Jesuits were behind the American rebels. In the book Catholics and the American Revolution, Volume 3, (1906) written by Catholic Martin Ignatius Joseph Griffin, Griffin explains that during the American Revolutionary War the British General Haldimand, while he was in Quebec, wrote a letter to British Prime Minister Lord North, which told Lord North that the French Jesuits were supporting the American rebels. Griffin writes:
“The French Jesuits were upholders of the American cause. Hence the English authorities in Canada did not wish such (Jesuits) to enter the country. They desired priests from Savoy or other places. In 1783 Gen. Haldimand wrote to Lord North that he had sent two French priests back to France; that the Bishop desired recruits from the seminaries in France; that he was under Jesuit influence; that he is honorable, but that the Jesuits have sided with the rebels.”
Additionally, Griffin wrote two other volumes of his book. From Catholics and the American Revolution, Volume 1, Griffin quotes British General Haldimand directly from a letter that Haldimand wrote to Lord North. In this letter, Haldimand states plainly to Lord North that the Jesuits are supporting the American rebels in the Revolutionary War. Haldimand states:
“The Jesuits are the only order of regular priests who have shown an attachment to the rebels during the course of the war.”
The Jesuit Carroll family played a major role in the American Revolution. They were one of the wealthiest American families of the era. There were three Carroll sons: Daniel, John and their first cousin Charles. All of them were trained in Jesuit warfare at the Jesuit St. Omer’s College in France. John Carroll became a teacher there. Daniel Carroll donated the land on which the U.S. Capitol Building sits. Property records from the 1600’s reveal that this land was called ‘Rome’. Charles Carroll was the War Commissioner during the American Revolution. John Carroll was a close friend of Benjamin Franklin and even lived at Franklin’s home. John Carroll founded the Jesuit powerhouse Georgetown University and would become the first Catholic Bishop of the United States.
In the decades following the American Revolution, the Americans built the U.S. Capitol Building as an exact replica of St. Peter’s Basilica and even put a statue of the queen of heaven/Babylon on top of it. Then they erected an obelisk facing the Capitol Building just like the one in the Vatican courtyard that faces St. Peter’s Basilica. A Vatican painter, Constantino Brumidi, painted the interior of the U.S. Capitol dome with the ‘Apotheosis of George Washington’, which mirrors paintings of the ‘Apotheosis of Ignatius Loyola’ found throughout Jesuit Churches in Rome. Could it be any more obvious who founded this country?
Rome hated the Constitution and Bill of Rights, but she permitted its creation knowing that she would eventually subvert and destroy it, and it didn’t take long. Its creation was only necessary to allow Romanism to flourish where Romanism had been banned. Rome was thinking long-term and her patience and diligence has paid off. As of the present day in the United States, Catholics out number Protestants. We have an intelligence community run by the Knights of Malta, which is subservient to the Jesuit Order. Six out of nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are Roman Catholic. We have 28 Jesuit colleges and Universities. Please understand that this writing is not an attack on Catholics. There are many good, everyday Catholic people in this country, but we must understand that Catholicism at the highest levels is Babylonian Sun Worship. It is the headquarters for occultism the world over. All of the other cults and ancient mystery schools flow from and feed into it. Rome has either launched or absorbed them all.
During the 19th and 20th Centuries, the counter-reformation continued and the subversion of Protestantism by the Jesuits would intensify in Britain and the United States. In Britain and America, much of the subversion has its roots in the Oxford Tractarian Movement and its Jesuitical futuristic prophetic schemes. These futuristic schemes would be later be attached to Zionism and its variants such as British-Israelism in order to influence the political sphere.
Froom writes of how Jesuitical futurism began to overcome Protestantism in England during the 1800’s:
“Catholic Futurism, initially projected by Jesuit Ribera about 1585, began to obtain a foothold and then gain momentum among Protestants in Britain. Thus the same concept that sought to break the force of the Reformation view of the papal Antichrist, by assuming a future infidel antichrist, was again invoked to weaken the force of the great evangelical advent and prophetic awakening. Protestant expositors, some leaning toward Rome and some prompted by rationalistic concepts, joined hands in the attempt—perhaps unwittingly—to promote the Jesuit position. This, moreover, came to be tied inseparably with the Oxford Tractarian Movement of the Anglican Church, wherein ninety tracts were scattered by the hundreds of thousands to favor Rome and to disprove the Protestant concept of Antichrist” (Leroy Froom, Prophetic Faith Of Our Fathers, Vol. 3, 655, 656).
Jesuit Futurism would influence Irving and Darby in England, and later Scofield in America:
“Far too many evangelicals today do not realize who was behind the work of Maitland, Todd, Burgh, and the whole Oxford Tractarian Movement. The reason that futurism made its way to Irving and Darby—and latter Scofield—is because it flourished in the Anglican Church, and the reason futurism flourished in Anglicanism is for the simple reason that the Jesuits were personally behind this work…The fact of the matter is clear: The whole Oxford movement with its birth of modern day dispensational futurism was, from its inception, a movement going back to Rome.” (D.S. Farris, Futurism: The Counterfeit Prophecy, Chp. 8)
After having been injected into the body of Christ, the concepts of Dispensational Futurism would later be leveraged to benefit political Zionism:
“the Jesuits were very successful at implementing Dispensational Futurism into the policies of Great Britain, and Britain indeed became the champion for Zionism. The Balfour Declaration was a letter dated November 2, 1917, from the British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour, to Lord Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation, a private Zionist organization. The letter stated the position, agreed at a British Cabinet meeting on October 31, 1917, that the British government supported Zionist plans for a Jewish “national home” in Palestine, with the condition that nothing should be done which might prejudice the rights of existing communities there. The Jesuit Illuminati was very successful in conditioning (through the Jesuit Counter Reformation) Great Britain to nurture the ideology of Zionism among European Jews. The second task of the Jesuits was to create events that would trigger the relocation of the Jews to Palestine. Part two of the Jesuit Illuminati’s geopolitical strategy was to create Fascism inevitably to create the State of Israel in Palestine.” (D.S. Farris, The Two-Horned Beast: Part Two – The New World Order, Chp. 11)
The roots of British-Israelism are obscure, but it appears to be a movement created for political purposes as opposed to something that Christians genuinely (and erroneously) believed in. In the early days of the Zionist movement, there were some British politicians who embraced British-Israelism and supported relocating the racial Jews to Palestine because they thought it would fulfill ‘prophecy’ faster and hasten the second coming of Christ. Most telling is that British-Israelism arose out of British Freemasonry; therefore, we can assume British-Israelism originated with the Jesuits considering the Jesuits control Freemasonry and the country of Britain. Barry Chamish wrote in an article titled ‘British Freemasonry Covets Israel’:
“Without British Freemasonry there would be no modern state of Israel. In the 1860s, the British-Israelite movement was initiated from within Freemasonry.”
Anton Chaitkin adds:
“The British monarchy and its prime ministers and Foreign Office fabricated British Israelism in the nineteenth century, from earlier versions of the story. They claimed that Queen Victoria was descended from the Biblical King David, and was thus a descendant of the Davidic family tree that produced Jesus. They taught that the tribes of Israel wandered into northern Europe; that by this supposed genealogy, the British are the real Chosen People, and the British Empire is thus God’s empire. The modern Jews, by this British account, are not the historical Hebrews of Old Testament Israel, but rather, the British are. But, says the British Israel myth, in a leap of logic, the Jews need to be put into Palestine, to fulfill prophecy, get slaughtered in a war with the Muslims, and bring about the End Times. To provide fuel for this mythology, the royal family asked the British Grand Lodge of Freemasonry to establish the Palestine Exploration Fund.”
What Anton Chaitkin is describing in British-Israelism is just another variation of Zionism, which ends up in the same place as regular Zionism – the racial Jews relocated to Palestine. However, Chaitkin misses the fact that the Jesuits created the false futuristic prophetic schemes that support Zionism. It wasn’t the British Royals who concocted the Oxford Tractarian Movement and its false future prophetic structures. Seemingly, British-Israelism is just another angle from which the Jesuits can cause people to focus on the flesh and earthly Jerusalem. The Jesuits are the great Zionists. Likely, the British Royals are working hand-in-hand with them and British-Israelism is a decoy to take our eyes off of the real plot of relocating the pope’s chair to Jerusalem.
History shows that the Vatican/Jesuits brought the Nazi regime into power in order to turn Europe into a nightmare for the Jews in hopes of relocating them to Palestine. To get the Christians on board with this program of a national homeland for the Jews in Palestine, Jesuit dispensationalism was pumped into American churches through the Scofield Reference Bible, which has caused Christians to support Israel with bloodthirsty, unwavering support.
According to some researchers such as Chamish, the Vatican was given control of all the ‘holy’ sites in east Jerusalem when Jesuit-trained Shimon Peres had the sites handed over to Vatican control through the Oslo Accords in 1993. The Vatican is apparently closing in on Jerusalem trying to regain what she lost to the Muslims during the crusades of the Middle Ages.
The only problem is that the Muslims still control the Dome of the Rock which supposedly sits on top of the remnant of Solomon’s Temple. The Vatican would like to rebuild Solomon’s Temple but needs to get the Dome of the Rock out of the way. Potential solutions in eyes of Vatican:
1) Foment World War III between the Muslims and the “Jews” in Israel and just take the Dome of the Rock from the Muslims.
2) Create peace and unity between Muslims, Jews, and Christians through ecumenism and just unite everybody on common religious ground, thus avoiding war, and make Jerusalem an international city.
Most likely, the idea that British Royals are going to make New Jerusalem in Britain or in the Middle East is just a Jesuit diversion. The British Royals aren’t pulling the strings of everything – the Jesuits and Rome are hiding behind them. The British government, like the U.S. government, is also infested with Freemasonry and the Knights of Malta among many other occult orders that feed into the Vatican. The real endgame is putting the pope’s chair in Jerusalem. After all, he is the ‘vicar’ of Christ and ‘God’ on earth, according to the papacy.
1.2 Billion “Christians” already bow down to him. The British Royals certainly don’t have that kind of devotion from the world’s people. The dumbed-down Protestants will support the pope in the name of unity if the right political conditions can be fabricated. Many Protestants already welcome the pope with open arms. The whole world is probably going to end up bowing down to him if and when he moves into Jerusalem, but God’s remnant will not. We’ve got our eyes on Jerusalem above. Praise God.
Sono questi i fili che uniscono l'ambasciata ecuadoriana a Londra con il resto del mondo. Al suo interno, resta chiuso da due mesi Julian Assange, assediato dalla polizia britannica. Fuori, proseguono le trattative per la soluzione del rebus diplomatico. Con una prima, timida apertura di Quito che, dopo aver concesso asilo al fondatore di Wikileaks, oggi si è detta disposta a trattare a patto che Assange non sia estradato negli Stati Uniti.
Secondi fonti diplomatiche, l'Ecuador sarebbe "pronto ad accettare un impegno britannico e svedese affinché, una volta che Assange avrà incontrato la magistratura svedese, non sarà estradato in un Paese terzo, e nello specifico negli Stati Uniti". Il passo avanti di oggi, "incoraggiato" dalla telefonata di ieri tra un alto esponente del Foreign Office e l'ambasciatore ecuadoriano, potrebbe agevolare i negoziati tra Gran Bretagna e Ecuador. Che, tuttavia, non nasconde la sua irritazione per la "minaccia" di un'intrusione della polizia britannica nell'ambasciata.
Un rischio giudicato ancora oggi "persistente" sul quale, parlando alla radio, si è soffermato il presidente Rafael Correa, tuonando: "Non hanno ancora capito che in America Latina non permettiamo più i colonialismi?". Più lontano appare invece un accordo con la Svezia che oggi, per voce del premier Fredrik Reinfeldt, si è detta "indignata" per "l'inaccettabile" posizione di Quito.
L'Ecuador, nel frattempo, lavora su più tavoli cercando sostegno tra i suoi alleati sudamericani. In serata, a Guayaquil, il caso sarà esaminato dall'Alleanza per i Popoli della Nostra America (Alba), di cui fanno parte anche Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba, Nicaragua. Poche ore dopo, sempre a Guayaquil, toccherà all'Unione delle Nazioni Sudamericane (Unasur) discutere del caso, che sarà anche sul tavolo del vertice dei ministri degli Esteri dell'Organizzazione degli Stati Americani (Osa), previsto per il 24 agosto a Washington.
Cresce, intanto, l'attesa per il discorso che domani Assange pronuncerà dall'ambasciata. L'australiano, dopo 5 mesi, riapparirà in pubblico alle ore 14, ma sulle modalità resta fitto il mistero. L'ipotesi più probabile è che parli da un balcone dell'edificio, per evitare di essere catturato dai poliziotti che stazionano 24 ore su 24 davanti l'ambasciata impedendogli qualsiasi via di fuga.
Chiuso in una delle dodici stanze della sede diplomatica, Assange può usufruire di una doccia, un computer, una lampada, e un tapis-roulant. Per i pasti, il personale della delegazione ricorre alla piccola cucina delle sede, o, più spesso, ai ristoranti vicini, dove giungono frequenti ordinazioni di pizza.
Le visite di poche amici - tra i quali l'assistente personale Sarah Harrison e Vaughan Smith, che a lungo lo ospitò a Norfolk - scandiscono la quotidianità di un Assange descritto come "annoiato e depresso". Un Assange che, lontano dalla luce del sole, al pianterreno di un edificio a due passi da Harrods, è riuscito comunque a tenere sotto scacco la diplomazia internazionale.
Descoperirea unei substante capabile sa inhibe productia de spermatozoizi ar putea conduce la obtinerea unei pilule contraceptive pentru barbati, cu efecte reversibile, fara a perturba sinteza de hormoni masculini, afirma autorii unui studiu american.
În contextul în care fabricarea unei pilule contraceptive masculine a devenit în ultimii ani o veritabila provocare pentru comunitatea stiintifica internationala, cercetatorii americani au testat cu succes o molecula - JQ1 - pe soareci, se afirma într-un articol publicat în revista medicala Cell.
This will be, beyond any argument, a blatant breach of the Vienna Convention of 1961, to which the UK is one of the original parties and which encodes the centuries – arguably millennia – of practice which have enabled diplomatic relations to function. The Vienna Convention is the most subscribed single international treaty in the world.
The provisions of the Vienna Convention on the status of diplomatic premises are expressed in deliberately absolute terms. There is no modification or qualification elsewhere in the treaty.
1.The premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter them, except with the consent of the head of the mission. 2.The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission or impairment of its dignity. 3.The premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of transport of the mission shall be immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.
Not even the Chinese government tried to enter the US Embassy to arrest the Chinese dissident Chen Guangchen. Even during the decades of the Cold War, defectors or dissidents were never seized from each other’s embassies. Murder in Samarkand relates in detail my attempts in the British Embassy to help Uzbek dissidents. This terrible breach of international law will result in British Embassies being subject to raids and harassment worldwide.
The government’s calculation is that, unlike Ecuador, Britain is a strong enough power to deter such intrusions. This is yet another symptom of the “might is right” principle in international relations, in the era of the neo-conservative abandonment of the idea of the rule of international law.
The British Government bases its argument on domestic British legislation. But the domestic legislation of a country cannot counter its obligations in international law, unless it chooses to withdraw from them. If the government does not wish to follow the obligations imposed on it by the Vienna Convention, it has the right to resile from it – which would leave British diplomats with no protection worldwide.
I hope to have more information soon on the threats used by the US administration. William Hague had been supporting the move against the concerted advice of his own officials; Ken Clarke has been opposing the move against the advice of his. I gather the decision to act has been taken in Number 10.
There appears to have been no input of any kind from the Liberal Democrats. That opens a wider question – there appears to be no “liberal” impact now in any question of coalition policy. It is amazing how government salaries and privileges and ministerial limousines are worth far more than any belief to these people. I cannot now conceive how I was a member of that party for over thirty years, deluded into a genuine belief that they had principles.
Craig Murray is an author, broadcaster and human rights activist. He was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004 and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010.
Craig Murray was born in West Runton in October 1958 and educated at Sheringham Primary and Paston Grammar schools.
He graduated from the University of Dundee in 1982 with a MA (Hons) 1st Class in Modern History.
From 1982 to 1984 he was President of Dundee University Students Association and he was a member of Dundee’s tournament winning Granada TV University Challenge team in 1983.
In 1984 he joined the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. As a member of the Diplomatic Service his responsibilities included the following:
1986-9 Second Secretary, Commercial, British High Commission, Lagos
Responsible for promoting British exports to, and business interests in, Nigeria.
1989-92 Head of Maritime Section, FCO, London
Responsible for negotiation of the UK and Dependent Territory continental shelf and fisheries boundaries, for implementation of the Channel Tunnel treaty and for negotiations on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. From August 1990 to August 1991 he was also head of the FCO Section of the Embargo Surveillance Centre, responsible for intelligence analysis on Iraqi attempts at evading sanctions, particularly in the field of weapons procurement, and with providing information to UK military forces and to other governments to effect physical enforcement of the embargo.
1992-4 Head of Cyprus Section, FCO London
Responsible for UN negotiations on the Cyprus dispute, relations with the government of Cyprus and for the mandate and requirements of the British contingent of the UN force in Cyprus,
1994-7 First Secretary (Political and Economic), British Embassy, Warsaw
Head of the Political and Economic sections of our Embassy in Poland. Responsible for relations with Poland, and assisting Poland’s post-communist transition process with reference to preparation for EU membership.
1997-8 Deputy Head, Africa Department (Equatorial), Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Responsible for British political and commercial relationships with West Africa, including development issues.
1998-2002 Deputy High Commissioner, British High Commission, West Africa Branch
Responsible for British economic, political, commercial and aid relationships with Ghana and Togo. In Autumn 1998 Craig Murray was the UK Representative at the Sierra Leone Peace talks held in Togo, Liberia and Sierra Leone, including direct negotiation with the RUF terrorist leadership.
2002-2004 British Ambassador, Uzbekistan
Responsible for our relationship with Uzbekistan. He found Western support for the dictatorial Karimov regime unconscionable, as detailed in the rest of this website.
At the 2005 UK General Election, Craig Murray takes on Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in Blackburn as an Independent candidate, winning 2,082 votes.
Assange, an Australian national, has been holed up in Ecuador’s London embassy since June. Ecuador’s Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino said it would be “unacceptable” were British police to force their way into the mission.
British authorities have "warned" Ecuador that they could raid its embassy and arrest Julian Assange if he is not handed over. The Ecuadorian Foreign Minister responded by saying such a move would be a "flagrant violation" of international law - READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/mqy04a
RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 500 million YouTube views benchmark.
The former hacker is wanted for questioning over sexual assault allegations in Sweden, but says he fears deportation to the United States, which may seek to try him for his website’s release of a trove of secret documents.
Patino said Wednesday that Ecuador “has made a decision” on Assange and will announce it Thursday at 7:00 am (1200 GMT). The foreign minister had earlier presented a report on the case to Ecuadoran President Rafael Correa.
Patino rounded on Britain for threatening to take 41-year-old Assange into custody by force, and warned such a move would not be tolerated.
“Today, we received from the United Kingdom an express threat, in writing, that they could storm our embassy if Ecuador does not hand over Julian Assange” the foreign minister told reporters.
“Ecuador rejects in the strongest terms the explicit threat made in Britain’s official communication,” he said.
“The position taken by the government of Great Britain is unacceptable, both from the political and the legal point of view,” the foreign minister said.
He warned that entering the embassy without authorization “would be a flagrant violation of the Vienna Convention” on diplomatic relations.
Assange took refuge at Ecuador’s embassy in London on June 19 to avoid extradition to Sweden, which he claims plans to eventually surrender him to US authorities.
But even if the asylum request is granted, it is unclear whether Assange will be allowed to leave, as British police were waiting outside the embassy ready to arrest him for breaching the terms of his bail granted in 2010.
“The UK has a legal obligation to extradite Mr Assange to Sweden to face questioning over allegations of sexual offences and we remain determined to fulfill this obligation,” a British Foreign Office spokesman said.
Assange had embarked on a marathon round of court battles, but finally exhausted all his options under British law in June when the Supreme Court overturned his appeal against extradition.
Quito had said it was reviewing the sexual misconduct allegations as it weighs his asylum request. Assange maintains he had consensual sex with the alleged Swedish victims.
Correa has said that the mere possibility that Assange could face capital punishment in the United States could be reason enough for his government to grant the activist’s asylum petition.
Assange’s WikiLeaks website infuriated Washington when it released hundreds of thousands of secret war reports from Iraq and Afghanistan and countless US embassy cables containing unguarded and at times embarrassing remarks by a number of world leaders and diplomats.
The leftist Correa has often been at odds with Washington and has expressed support for Assange, offering him asylum as far back as 2010 before later backing off.
Offering shelter to a high-profile figure like Assange — hailed as a whistleblower by his supporters — could help Correa push back against critics who accuse him of clamping down on press freedom.
Britain’s Foreign Office later released a statement saying it hoped a “mutually acceptable” solution could still be found, but warned it would do all it could to extradite Assange.
“We have an obligation to extradite Mr Assange and it is only right that we give Ecuador the full picture,” the spokesman said of the letter sent by Britain to Quito.
“Throughout this process, we have drawn the Ecuadorans’ attention to relevant provisions of our law.”
The law which Britain is threatening to invoke is the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987, which allows it to revoke the diplomatic immunity of an embassy on British soil.
WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson told AFP that the threat to storm the embassy was “extremely serious” and said that the group’s legal team refuted its legality.
Around 10 police were present outside the embassy late Wednesday, according to an AFP reporter, while two were visible inside the lobby itself.